Press Release March 11, 2007

WHAT IT WAS LIKE IN PRISON

“Prison in Honolulu was a terrible most horrifying experience for me. It was abusive of my ex-husband (Jan Weinberg) and the judge (Darryl Y. C. Choy) and his pals to resort to this kind of action at the Honolulu courthouse. The reason for our divorce was my ex-husband's abusive behavior and temper. He has a terrible temper and would abuse me.” (Brenda Dickson, who has a California Senate Resolution for her work with the U.S.O. and who has toured the globe with Bob Hope and Johnnie Grant (Founded Jobs for Vets with Nancy Regan) was recently released from prison in Honolulu, Hawaii.) "After seventeen days in prison and I contracted lice, was running a 104 degree fever. I was ill and frightened. All my rights were taken away by Jan’s friends in the Hawaii courts. I was so ill that I fainted at my last court appearance when the press appeared. I had been locked up with out shampoo or creams and my hair we put oil in our hair to avoid lice and tied it up. I was given only a bar of soap and a toothbrush. I didn’t eat for almost seventeen days, as the food was not at all my usual diet. I simply did not want to eat the prison food. Nor did I sleep, I was in a dorm-type setting with 60 women. The women I was incarcerated with had been convicted of murder, assault, knife threats, drug possession, dealing ice, and prostitution. It was a dangerous place to be!"

"I was placed in handcuffs and leg chains and put behind bars because I refused to sign fraudulent papers that gave my ex-husband all my property and I had no way of honoring. The Judge pushed a trial forward when I had no representation, no funds to pay for a trial, and no expert witnesses to represent me. It was a complete “set up” by my ex’s attorneys and his judge pals. Testimonies of similar experiences are pouring into my website of women victimized in the same manner, same players."

"Judge Choy wanted me to sign a divorce decree I had no way of honoring, so he put me in prison as a tactic to get me to sign on the dotted line. He had pushed a trail forward where I had no legal representation, no money to mount a trial for my defense against plaintiff, no exhibits, no witnesses allowed on my behalf – so that my ex could lie and cheat about the real value of our multi-million dollar law firm. My attorney asked for an extension of trial due to the complexity of my case and the fact that she was working on another case at the same time. The judge refused her request and went on a cruise knowing her attorney was leaving the case and my attorney had no choice but to leave me without representation. The doctor’s wrote a letter to Judge Choy recommending the trial be postponed due to my severe illness and nervous breakdown. The judge refused the doctors letters. The judge pushed the trial forward anyway. He knew that I was heavily medicated on prescription drug “Avidon” a strong muscle relaxant that caused me to be unaware of my surroundings. Another attorney was retained by me and was given only one day to prepare for my multi-million dollar trial. This turned out to be a set-up by both the judge and attorney Charles Kleintop. Even so it was proven at this trial that $3.3 million dollars came into the law firm after a false business evaluation was prepared. The fraudulent business evaluation stated only $387,000.00 in asset value. The total value of the couple assets should be $5.4 million as proven in the one-day trial although we believe Jan’s caseload is worth in the $30 million range. Mr. Weinberg was deep in debt upon our marriage. This material debt of Weinberg was conveniently left out of Mr. Kleintop’s property chart as presented before Judge Choy after the so-called trial as well as the $3.3 million in cash. The judge ignored my property chart of $4.3 million dollars was coming into the firm as proved by my attorney. The judge completely ignored my property chart presentation as it came in to court after the trial transcript was issued to add up the huge amounts of cash."

In April, a Motion to Set Aside - To have the court set aside this fraudulent decree on grounds of fraud and to seek her rightful spousal support of $31,000.00 per month to restart her 2004 martial agreement, the agreement was set aside for no good reason. Ms. Dickson came to Hawaii with a rightfully negotiated and signed agreement. One of the conflicts of interest the judge set aside. Attorney Kleintop has asked and received from Judge Choy an arrest warrant for Ms. Dickson should she place foot on Hawaii soil. Her bail is set at $20,000.00. Ms. Dickson through her attorney, Cheryl Brawley has asked that judge recuse himself from her case due to obvious fraud and prejudice. Attorney Kleintop and Judge Choy have gotten in the way of due process throughout the divorce case. The true culprit is Jan Weinberg, why doesn’t he just settle this case and let Ms. Dickson go on with her life. Jan Weinberg was in debt, owning no equity in anything – not even a condo – and no caseload. Brenda Dickson, on the other hand, helped Weinberg build a new image for his business and himself – teaching him how to promote himself and worked tirelessly on his career and their properties. She deserves half of the property.

A special thanks to Chief Justice Ronald Moon of the Hawaii Supreme Court who asked that Brenda Dickson’s condo in Los Angeles be “stayed” on the Appellate Court and asked for relief on her behalf. Hawaii is so beautiful, it’s a shame a few bad eggs are spoiling its integrity. Ms. Dickson would like her half of the estate now and it is her right to Due Process under the 14th Amendment. A special word of thanks to Ted Jackson and warden at OCCC for allowing her “Freedom of the Press.” Brenda wishes all the girls a safe trip home and never to return, start a new life.

Please stay tuned; there's more to this story.

 

Press Release March 8, 2007

Dear Judge Choy:

As you know, a Rule 60B "Fraud" has been filed to be heard April 11, 2007 (we asked to have it heard on March 8, 2007 and it was denied) to set aside the "fraudulent divorce decree" that does not in any way reflect my half of the marital estate and deprives me of my rightful support. "Hawaii Revised Support." Virtually, all of my rights have been stripped away. Now, instead of allowing "Due Process", you want to ignore the Rule 60B to reinstate my contract, set aside the divorce decree and get my rightful support. Instead, the Rule 60B on some chump change from my multi-million dollar estate is being heard. The $1,000 a day fine. More fraud. Pressing forward with the March 8, 2007, and some stupid Rule 60B regarding the fine of $160,000 to my ex-husband and Kleintop will be handled to set aside the fraudulent divorce decree and it will given back to me. This condo at least belongs to me and much much more in the millions, Judge Choy.

The Rule 60B also entails the fraud of the 2004 Marital Settlement Agreement. A perfectly good fully signed and negotiated Agreement. Again, unbelievably, you have stepped in the middle of "due process". I have every right to set aside the "fraudulent divorce decree" as you deliberately pushed a multi-million dollar trial forward with no representation for me, as you went on a cruise and left me unrepresented and turned down the only one day extension asked for, with an attorney that had another trial at the same time and needed the extension. While you went on the cruise, you left me without representation as you pushed the trial forward weeks away.

Also, my money for the trial was frozen in the court, so I had no money to mount the trial and hire anyone, as you left it frozen in the court. You also instructed my attorney, who had to get out of the case as she was a sole practitioner, to get out on her own motion, as you left on a cruise, leaving a motion limine, which meant I wasn't allowed any exhibits or witnesses at the "so called" trial.
In addition, I had a breakdown from the abusive discretion and abusive process of the prior Judge Radius and Attorney Kleintop orders, not limited to having me taken out of my home in my name before the trial by police, ordered it sold (with a minimal mortgage of $5,000 per month), without a book or record looked at, and put my expensive possessions in public storage uninsured, leaving me with my clothes on my back. Again, I had an appraisal which you ignored, and it was sold $1.3 million under market value. Again, "due process" slipped up by the usual friendship of the attorney and judges in Honolulu, Hawaii. Even an attorney realtor friend of Kleintop got to list my home. There was no reason to sell that property. We subpoenaed the file on the sale you refused to give me. The file on the sale of my home?! "Due Process" and my rights violated again. The house in my name was purchased by a couple whose house was not for sale, they just quickly left it, one moved into my house as the huge discounted price.

In the Rule 60B, you are asked to step down for obvious reasons. Instead of allowing this due process, my right to set aside the "fraudulent divorce decree" on grounds of fraud or mistake, you have pushed the ridiculous March 8, 2007 Gestapo like order which you had me stay in prison with convicts and waiting to be sentenced felons who had committed crimes from murder to assault for 17 days.The paper you made me sign said I had the authority to honor it. I don't have the $15,000 to move as you have stripped me of my rightful support which was asked for in the April 11, 2006 60B Motion filed and my multi-million dollar estate! The abusive process is beyond ridiculous. It is complete fraud.
I ask that you cancel this motion and ridiculous hearing on a "fraudulent divorce decree." I am told the Appellate Court is a joke. That women go back to the "Cesspool" 777 Punchbowl over and over, some of them never getting their property, as many are faced with the same judges and "Boys Club" mentality.

I had done research on the Gestapo tactics of Attorney Kleintop and his judge friends. I suggest you stop getting in the way of "Due Process". I have every right to set aside the fraudulent divorce decree that does not reflect my half of the marital estate. Other women have had police abuse arranged by Kleintop and Judge Radius and you!

You are pushing it by having me arrested. If I came back into town on March 8, 2007, I have a right to a fair trial, I have a right to representation, money to mount the trial, to be physically and mentally prepared for the trial, not loaded or drugged prescribed by a doctor. You didn't even evaluate my property chart that stated Jan Weinberg owed $4.3 million to Brenda Dickson. Instead, you evaluated Mr. Kleintop's chart that left out the $3.3 million cash proven at trial, my $500,000 IRA, my $240,000 annuity, my half of the 401k as a wife and not an employee, my half of the multi-million dollar business I helped to create. You forgave Weinberg's pre-marital debts and left me with mine and gave him his Category One Money, and mine!

Again, I suggest you stop the Gestapo tactics, and see to it that I get my half of the estate, a fair trial, and my rightful support and/or my contract of 2004, as it was set aside for no good reason. Again, it is my right to do this.

The March 8, 2007 hearing is a fraud. It is based on a "fraudulent divorce decree". Not a book or record was looked at. It is a disgrace to use Gestapo tactics to take womens' children away if they set foot on Hawaii soil and have them arrested, or bake cookies at a school to use the police to intimidate them and to threaten to arrest them if they continue to bake cookies and force them to sign a statement, to take away rights, it is disgusting. Yes! That is right. I am talking to other victims of this police abuse!
I suggest you allow "Due Process" to go forward. I have a right to challenge on fraud, the "so called" decree. I have done it on April 11, 2007. I suggest you step down. There is a matter of $1.125 million in illegal transfers that you have ignored. Stop the arrest or threatened arrest of innocent people of the "Honolulu Boys Club". Your are a disgrace to this country. Let "Due Process" go forward. It is the 14th Amendment.

Brenda Dickson

 

Press Release March 4, 2007

A special thanks to the Honolulu Advertiser who came to visit Brenda in prison (a holding cell for convicted felons, and people waiting to be sentenced). Her 17-day stay was horrifying to her. Thanks to Ken Kobayashi of the Honolulu Advertiser and ABC's Daryl Huff, Soap Opera Weekly and Digest's Janet DiLauro for calling me and visiting me in prison.

BRENDA DICKSON DEPRIVED OF A "FAIR TRIAL"

A set up by a group of attorneys and judges -- "The Old Boys Network" -- defrauded Brenda Dickson out of her rightful spousal support and her half of the marital estate. She was to be put out on the street! Her estate is a multi-million dollar estate.

In 2006, due to a conflict of interest, Brenda Dickson lost her attorney in the small town of Honolulu, Hawaii. The conflict of interest with her attorney is caused as her attorney ex-husband, Jan Weinberg, after practicing for thirty years, knew all the judges and most all of the attorneys. An incredible story of Judge Choy and Judge Radius of the Honolulu Courts, slowly taking away all her rights to the point they want to make her homeless and deprive her of her multi-million dollar estate. The level of criminal behavior by the Honolulu Courts is beyond belief. And they are part of the U.S. of America!
When Brenda Dickson got to Hawaii for her divorce, she had a fully negotiated contract, signed by her ex-husband. There were some alleged undisclosed cash of $1.4 million, and illegal transfers of cash by her ex-husband so, Ms. Dickson was advised to enter into mediation to see if the contract was fair. She existed on 8 months of virtually no spousal support except for two $5,000 checks. Prior to the separation, Brenda Dickson had lived on $40,000 a month with light travel. The couple's income was $200,000 to $300,000 a month.

They are multi-millionaires. They lived the lifestyle of the very privileged, yet Brenda Dickson would first hear the words. "The judges are cowboys in mediation”, in Honolulu. Some judges only like to give a middle class lifestyle? Brenda Dickson being a U.S. patriot found this unbelievable. The mediation contract stated all prior rights will remain if the mediation was unsuccessful. After her attorney, giving her ex-husband a referral fee contract for himself, got a percentage of the case, Ms. Dickson left the firm to enforce her rightful contract and drop the mediation. In her first meeting with Judge Radius, an unbelievable occurrence happened that would break every law in the book. Judge Radius would order Brenda Dickson out of her home in her name with no support and no money to move. Brenda Dickson had her attorney get an extension. An odd subsequent support trial took place when her attorney insisted on asking for a small amount of what her standard of living was what her ex-husband wanted. Ms. Dickson had taken the time to get the "Hawaii Revised Statue Support Laws" from a Los Angeles attorney that stated standard of living to restart her life and career. This is called restorative alimony under the Hawaii Revised Statutes. Ms. Dickson's standard of living was $40,000 per month without gifts and light travel. In the hallway of the Honolulu Courthouse, her attorney rapped off statements like, we've taken this out of the support before the trial (hair, make-up, wardrobe). The Judge gives Brenda Dickson $6,000 per month to move and rent a place and live! This was her first check in over a year. The $6,000 check was 24 hours late, and said to be lost in the mail. So Brenda Dickson did not leave immediately yet waited for the new check to be issued.

This was not good enough for her ex-spouse attorney Jan Weinberg’s attorney Chuck Kleintop, ironically, head of the Office of Disciplinary Council, and he immediately met on an ex-parte basis with Judge Radius, who immediately ordered a police patrol to forcibly take Brenda Dickson out of her home at 3649 Nuuanu Pali Drive, in Honolulu, Hawaii. There was no need to move her before the already scheduled trial, without looking at a book or record. The mortgage was only $5,000 per month. She had created the equity. Brenda Dickson, not at all trained, took 7 1/2 years of her life to put on the hat of a contractor, architect, and designer. The home, when bought, was a "Historical Home" that had not been touched for 65 years. After purchase it was found to be a fired hazard, and largely termite infested and was falling down on the garage side. Because the couple had no money, Brenda Dickson used her separate money to build a master suite on the house. His and her master suites, a Viking kitchen fully restored with marble and garnet, and went over every inch of this house inside and out. It was an overwhelming task but after 7 1/2 years the home was fully restored and had a lot of equity.

Ms. Dickson also helped her husband when business was in the red upon marriage. He had no case load due to terrible advertising. Ms. Dickson, aware of his talent as an attorney, and with her experience working for Columbia Pictures/C.B.S. for 13 years, knew how to promote her ex-husband which was a full-time job as well. She advertised him, promoted him, redid his dusty. disorganized office, and created a case load for him. He was so low on cases he had to do retiring attorney cases when married and rent out his office to other attorneys. Ms. Dickson completely redid his office, his advertising and his image. After 3 years, the office was climbing off the charts in a very competitive market. Brenda Dickson promoted him as she would promote herself. She was always number one in her field of being a top rated soap star. She was always voted #1 in her field. One hundred million people knew her face and name worldwide. Ms. Dickson was entitled to her half of the multi-million dollar business and her rightful revised support. She got nothing. While barefoot in shock, she was taken out of her home by police, awaken out of a sleep in her bed at 7:30 a.m., as they grabbed her precious gowns, pictures and personal effects, and put them in uninsured public storage.

Ms. Dickson would not get any of her rights. Her support on her half of the business would all be taken from her by the "Cowboys Judges" in Hawaii Courts, who have a "conflict of interest" as her attorney ex-husband has been an attorney for over 30 years. She ended up at the beautiful Royal Hawaiian Hotel. Brenda called her husband all night long begging him to put her clothes back and her office, some precious disks of her posters and work disappeared in the move as the police dumped her things in public storage. Ms. Dickson borrowed money from her mother who is 84 years old, to be able to stay in the hotel. She went to the public storage and found a wall of wardrobe boxes stuffed into a room she could not even enter. She went to Neiman Marcus to get clothes, make-up, shoes, etc. using her mother's credit card to appear in Court, as her ex-attorney Everett Cuscaden, fought for the only money she was given for the trial $40,000 (January 10, 2006). This money would remain frozen in the Court as Judge Radius sat on it until days before the trial. Attorney Kleintop had the police come to her door at the Royal Hawaii Hotel with a restraining order to keep her from her home. With all her art on the wall she came into the marriage with. He stated Ms. Dickson was dangerous to her husband. The policemen laughed, and said, "You don't look dangerous to me," as he handed her the warrant to appear in Court. Ms. Dickson remembered an attorney referring to Mr. Kleintop as a "Nazi". She wondered if he was. She appeared before a judge who threw the restraining order case out of the courtroom. Still it was very, very upsetting to Ms. Dickson. While Ms. Dickson was unrepresented, Attorney Kleintop continued to serve legal documents to her at the Executive Center Hotel, a $100 a night room was provided for her by her mother. This was substandard living as she had no money to pay the unpaid credit cards as her ex-husband pocketed $300,000 a month ($15,000 to $30,000 per day). Worse yet. Attorney Kleintop continued to serve her with documents to prepare for a multi-million dollar trial. Ms. Dickson called him to stop. She had no representation, as the time for preparation for the multi-million dollar trial was taken up by Attorney Kleintop. Ms. Dickson filed a motion through the court. She was not represented and needed a new trial attorney. Attorney Kleintop urged his client, Jan Weinberg, to lie and state Ms. Dickson forged his signature on the 2004 Marital Settlement Contract she came to Hawaii with. This took time! First, Attorney Kleintop attempted to hire Jim Josey of the Hawaii Police Department, a handwriting expert. Mr. Josey refused the case, as he stated it was Jan Weinberg's signature. So, with Jim Josey in the Hallway of the 2004 Marital Settlement Agreement trial, Judge Radius found there was a fully negotiated and signed agreement. Yet, she still took it from Ms. Dickson stating it was filed under a different case number?! This was not "Abandonment" but a conflict of interest decision.

In 2004, the couple tried a failed reconciliation. However, the negotiated contract was agreed upon and signed by both parties. The divorce case ran itself through the system in about seven months. So, Weinberg, when he was notified, got on a jet plane to Los Angeles and filed the divorce case under a different number. He brought his own service person, a locksmith. So, Judge Radius ordered. (Because a fully negotiated file was presented, negotiated by Weinberg, a quitclaim deed of the Nuuanu home ready to sign). Judge Radius still, after all the evidence, ruled that there was fully negotiated signed agreement. But it was "abandoned" because it was filed under a different case number? It was not abandoned by Ms. Dickson. She does not believe she will ever get a fair anything in the Hawaii Courts. In addition, the mediation contract, as well as Hawaii State Law states, that all mediation be private and nothing addressed in court. All Attorney Kleintop could talk about was a mediation offer Brenda Dickson's brother made while she was ill. A fishing expedition offer to see what the couple's financial situation was, as no accountant was even on the scene.

THE FINAL BLOW

Ms. Dickson got more legal papers which were not even properly served according to the Hawaii Revised Statutes, shoved under her door at the Executive Center Hotel by Attorney Kleintop stating that Real Estate Agent Pat Case, former sister in law of American Online Mogul Mr. Steve Case, was listing her home. Her Nuuanu Estate was listed well under market price! Pat Case got her hands on Brenda Dickson's home through Attorney Kleintop who stated he gave the property to her and they were friends. Now they had their hands on Brenda Dickson's home in Hawaii and would eventually sell it for $1.3 million under market price to a person who quickly moved out of their home in the Salt Lake District of Oahu, and moved into Brenda Dickson's home without even having their home on the market! You can only imagine the conversation between Pat Case and the Sigmores! How many people are lucky enough to grab a home at $1.3 million under market price! All Brenda Dickson's equity went up in smoke. When the attorneys found out Brenda Dickson was filing a Stay Order in the Appellate Court, Ms. Case quickly sold Brenda Dickson's home for $1.5 million, which was not even the cost of the lot.

Brenda Dickson, at Michel's Restaurant in Waikiki, met Michael Hands who put her in touch finally with one attorney who did not know her husband, Attorney Madelyn Purcell. Ms. Purcell knew Brenda had no money. She agreed to take the case at a $5,000 retainer, with the agreement that if an extension on the April, 2006 trial could not be gotten (she felt it would be granted), she had to back out of the case as she had another pressing trial at the same time. So, March 1, 2006 (after calling every attorney in Hawaii and being turned down for conflict of interest), Brenda and Madelyn entered to an agreement for the April 11, 2006 trial date extension. It was said that Judge Choy was a friend of Everett Cuscaden, which is why he would not allow the one and only extension asked for on the trial!

The day of the hearing for an extension of time on the trial, Mr. Kleintop ignored the 8 day Rule of notifying Ms. Dickson of his argument in advance. He put in about 30 pages (unread by Ms. Dickson) the day of the hearing, opposing an extension, lying as usual as to the actual events that occurred. Judge Choy refused the extension of Brenda's new attorney, Madelyn Purcell, and told her to get out of the case herself as he went on a cruise, leaving Brenda Dickson without representation, and the money for the trial frozen in the Court. So, she had no money to move forward with the trial, not a book or record was looked at (which Judge Choy knew). Madelyn had to leave town but did a motion to answer the Attorney Kleintop Motion to explain what happened. Before this Judge Choy hearing, Madelyn asked Judge Radius for an extension. She disappeared. Up popped Judge Choy.

Meanwhile, in March, Brenda Dickson had a breakdown in Dr. Caursor's office, a doctor in Honolulu. She was so distraught the doctor called an ambulance for her. She cried for five hours straight in the hospital. They put her on "Avidon", a very strong sedative. Four doctors wrote Judge Choy letting him know she was in no condition for a trial. As Madelyn left town, Brenda Dickson flew home, as she could not afford to stay in a hotel. She was extremely distraught. She saw Dr. Metz, a doctor she did not know. She was experiencing shortness of breath. Dr. Metz did an EKG on her heart. It was irregular. He wrote Judge Choy twice, telling him she was on prescription drugs and in no condition for trial. He even sent the "Off" EKG. Judge Choy pushed the trial through anyway.

Attorney Mary Luccass, Attorney Madlyn Purcell's ex-associate, was busy trying to release the money to fund Brenda Dickson's representation days before the trial. Attorney Mary Luccass told Judge Choy this is a multi-million dollar case. She needed at least two months to prepare. Attorney Kleintop was paid $189,000 monthly cash from the couple's business, while Brenda had no funds at all for the trial. Attorney Weinberg also purchased two cars -- a 2006 Jaguar for approximately $44,000 and a 2006 Range Rover for his son for approximately $21,000. He traveled all over the country first class, he paid off his attorneys, his credit cards and left Brenda Dickson in approximately $75,000 of credit card debts, dating back from 2004 to before the divorce. This is what the judge arranged at this trial.
Attorney Mary Luccass' office rather than default, agreed, the day before the trial, to take it forward. A motion in limine occurred because Madelyn was released. So, Brenda Dickson was allowed no witnesses or exhibits at trial. Judge Choy pushed a case forward with no representation to Brenda Dickson, no money to hire new counsel, no witnesses or exhibits allowed, no work done on the case, while Ms. Dickson was comatose.

Brenda Dickson did not get to meet with Attorney Luccass before the trial. This was a conflict of interest that would get in the way of representation. Judge Choy's son worked in her office. Ms. Luccass asked Judge Choy at least four times to recuse. He refused. She asked Judge Choy to step down as this was a conflict of interest. Judge Choy refused to step down.

Later, when Brenda Dickson met with the F.B.I. in Los Angeles, California, Mary Luccass refused to talk to them, or say anything bad about Judge Choy. His son worked as the attorney in her office. She was also doing a personal injury case against Weinberg. Total conflict of interest. Brenda had to find another attorney.

Judge Choy, at the "so called" trial accepted a property chart made out by Attorney Kleintop. Ms. Dickson did not have time to do her property chart. Attorney Mary Luccass brought in the case list of Weinberg (huge case list!) She proved that after the "so called" Business Evaluation (December 2005), that $3.3 million cash came into the firm from January 2006 to March 2006. This cash was not on Kleintop's chart. Half of the $3.3 million cash belonged to Brenda Dickson. The couple had income tax deductions on the income. In addition, the couple had over $2 million of annuities and IRA Charles Schwab's. It was proven at the trial that Brenda Dickson had a $500,000 unconditional IRA Contract with her ex-husband, plus the cash income, and half of the marital estate. Instead, Judge Choy ignored the cash and all her assets. Attorney Mary Luccass handed in a $4.3 million property chart owed to Ms. Dickson after adding up the cash cases that came after the trial transcript came out to the firm of $3.3 million. Judge Choy ignored Ms. Dickson's chart that also included Mr. Weinberg's pre-marital debt. Ms. Dickson was to be credited for, Judge Choy not only forgave his pre-marriage debt, he also gave away Brenda Dickson's separate, personal money, which she had come into the marriage, to her ex-husband!, rendering her penniless and helpless. This Judge deliberately raped her of all her rights and property, not to mention a dollar or dime of her rightful "Hawaii Revised Support". He gave her no support. Mr. Weinberg was fully prepared to lie about almost everything while Brenda Dickson barely made it to court drugged on "Avidon" completely out of it.

This behavior is completely against the 14th Amendment that states that no state, no jurisdiction can get in the middle of due process. To put a multi-million dollar trial with no expert witnesses, no representation, no money to mount the trial, no exhibits or witnessed allowed in, and Ms. Dickson comatose on "Avidon" unable to comprehend what was going on around her, is a disgrace.

Judge Choy ruled that Brenda Dickson would have no support at all! Totally against Hawaii Revised Statute Law. Judge Choy wanted her homeless and out on the street, as he arranged to sell her home $1.3 million under market value and to try the same trick in Los Angeles with his unbelievable ruling. Weinberg flew to Los Angeles to sell her condo without listing it (under value) to some person he just happened to have around to buy it. Again, Judge Choy took her out of the condo sale as well. She also worked on this condo. By law, Ms. Dickson is entitled to a roof over her head, her half of the estate, and her support.

The final blow in this "Nazi" regime -- Judge Choy asked her to move out, sign on the dotted line that she had $15,000 to move and $4,000 to store her property to put her on the street. When she told him she did not have the money, he threw her in jail. A cell with convicted felons, and people awaiting to be sentenced. A nightmare experience. The only way he would let her out of prison was to sign off on Judge Baker's orders of Santa Monica, California.

Judge Baker, in California, ruled in a two day trial that Brenda Dickson had a right to stay in her condo. Judge Choy wanted her to sign off and do the impossible pay for a $15,000 move, so she could end up homeless as her ex-husband kept all her property and cash in the millions.

Under duress and 17 days in prison, Ms. Dickson agreed to sign on Judge Choy's orders or go back to prison. She signed. Brenda Dickson's California Attorney, Herb Wolf, is trying to keep a roof over her head.

Attorney Kleintop called to have her condo measured yesterday, a nightmare. She has no money for food, much less a move. Mr. Weinberg would like Brenda to live off her 84 year old mother's retirement savings.
Meanwhile, Attorney Cheryl Brawly has put in a Rule 60B to set aside the fraudulent decree. There were illegal transfers of $1.125 million of her ex-husband to his friends during the failed reconciliation and divorce decisions. In addition, Rule 60B states -- "Fraud or Mistake". To have Ms. Dickson go through a trial on "Avidon" was, of course, against due process, not to mention no representation, no work done on the trial, no books or records looked at, and no expert or witnesses allowed in for Ms. Dickson, just a few reason for Judge Choy to step down.
Ms. Dickson has asked for $31,000 per month support as there was no time to subpoena the credit cards.

Ms. Dickson asks her fans in Hawaii to show up on March 8, 2007 at 8:30 a.m. at the 777 Punchbowl Divorce Court, in a Martin Luther King manner, in support of her, in a quiet fashion as no citizen of Hawaii should go through this kind of treatment.

The attorneys would like to push this off into the Appellate Court. However, Ms. Dickson knows all too well the fate of many women in Hawaii who have been defrauded out of all their rights. They go to the Appellate Court and come back to what Ms. Dickson refers to as the "Cesspool" and never get their property. Her Appellate Court Attorney, Peter Esser, has had thirty cases against Judge Choy. This is one attorney with more than half of the cases connected to Attorney Kleintop. One girl deprived of her support, has been back three times. This is "America". People died so that our Constitution would remain strong.

This group of judges and attorneys need to be stopped. There is more to this story. These are some of the facts. Just some of the facts. There is more. Ms. Dickson was told that even if Judge Choy steps down, the judges all know one another. They don't want to up-stage one another or hurt one another's feelings. Ms. Dickson has been defrauded in excess of $4.3 million from the one day trial. At this time, Ms. Dickson will only tell you this much. There is more.

Thank you, Brenda Dickson