(Continued from home page) This was not a trial but a way for the attorneys to steal the Marital Estate and take $861,000 in fees! For a totally prepared trial that cost $30,000 in 2006. These attorneys and judges belong in prison. I can and will be pressing criminal charges.
The attorneys and judges managed to re-launder a $6.5 million income to my ex-husband, as well as most of the Estate. There is more to this story than meets the eye. Stayed tuned as the real truth as to who is involved in this will come out!
The attorneys did not look at a book or record for this so-called "Trial," as my ex-husband, Jan Weinberg, was in "Contempt of Court." He left town for the trial. He did not participate in the trial at all.
Judge McKenna, the Trial Judge for five months, was lifted up to the Supreme Court days before the trial. Judge Murakami took her place. (Odd!)
In order for Madalyn Purcell to get a $200,000 advance in fees for the trial, she lied to Judge McKenna, stating (as she did to me) this would be a $10 million trial. Well, millions of dollars of trust accounts, bank accounts, and other records equalling about a $150,000 in accounting fees, would have to be looked at for such a trial. Instead, no books or records were looked at. No Trial Brief was done. No Property Chart, or Exhibit List were given to the Court. No Support Motion to prove my $50,000 a month "Standard of Living." All this work was already done and had been prepared by Mary Lucasse (my attorney in 2006) for the 2006 Trial. All Madalyn Purcell needed to do was to submit them to the Court! Instead, she hid them from the Court. The only documents handed in to the Court were the Income Tax Returns, where Madalyn Purcell, on purpose, left out millions owed to me from those. Mary Lucasse's Property Chart for the 2006 Trial did not have the $6.5 million of income tax returns to make her Property Chart (more cash had to be added with the returns!)
The judge decided not to give me any money from the $1 million plus income to our estate, proven (the only small amount of money Madalyn did prove, a small portion of the multi-million income. She failed to try the rest on purpose).
Judge Murakami said that the "Contingency Fee Cases" were not worth anything, even though he knew our multi-million dollar marital income went directly into my ex-husband's pockets.
The Appellate Court stated that I should get my one-half of the "Contingency Fee Cases".
Madalyn left out $4.3 million pure cash income my ex-husband did keep during the 2006 proceeding. (This was not an accident. They were all in on the "Kangaroo" Action, getting as much cash as they could from the Estate.)
The case was assessed at $50,000 cost to be tried by the Court. Until Madalyn Purcell began to lie about what she was going to prove... a $10 million case, which is what it was! She just didn't do the work to prove it.
Judge Murakami, replaced the Trial Judge, Judge McKenna. She was moved up to the Supreme Court right before the trial. Judge McKenna had the case for five months. Madalyn began to lie about what she was going to prove, stating to Judge McKenna that this was a $9 million case and she was still counting. Purcell did not prove a $9 million case, and, made no attempt to do so.
When my ex-husband took off and didn't show up for trial, Madalyn didn't bother to subpoena the trust accounts and the checking accounts, or do any research, even though she had all the account numbers.
It gets worse! Judge McKenna, the Trial Judge, made a Pre-Trial Order, which stated that no attorney fees, fines, or, sanctions could be imposed against me for the illegal jailing. They put me in jail, while they illegally sold my property, stating my ex-husband was broke. This was done with NO "Due Process". There were millions of dollars and, no need to sell my real property! Meanwhile, and as a proof... At the 2011 Trial, we have the $6.5 million income he pocketed during those court proceedings in 2006! which I got none of! Do they give me back my home... my condo they stole from me in 2006, when they put me in jail and sold it with NO "Due Process"? Of course not!
The new judge, Judge Murakami, who golfs with my ex-husband's attorney, Chuck Kleintop (who manoeuvered the whole thing in the first place), decided not to obey the Pre-Trial Order. All the attorneys were in on this manoeuver to take $261,000 of my real property cash in "fines and sanctions" and "attorneys fees" that went to the judges golfing buddy. Attorney Chuck Kleintop's fee charges, and, sanctions, ordered by Judge Choy, who was completely set aside by the Supreme Court.
Judge Murakami reinstated Judge Choy's "Sanctions and Fees" against me (to go to Chuck Kleintop's fees) imposed by the now set aside Judge Choy. In 2011, even though he knew Judge Choy was completely set aside in 2010 by the Supreme Court and the Intermediate Court of Appeals on the grounds of NO "Due Process".
The "Racketeering For Fees" continues in the State Court. Here, Judge Murakami breaks the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which is the cornerstone of our Constitution. It separates the State from Nazi Germany, and it protects every citizen in the United States of America... THE STATE CANNOT TAKE YOUR LIBERTY, YOUR LIFE, OR YOUR PROPERTY WITHOUT "DUE PROCESS".
So, Judge Murakami takes $261,000 in fines, sanctions and attorneys fees from 2006 (this is my half of the real property money). This is totally against the Supreme Court's decision, where it is found by the higher Courts of Appeal. THERE WAS NO "DUE PROCESS" IN 2006. This case stinks to high haven. The same criminal players are still involved in 2011. The judge golfs with him. Judge Murakami doesn't disclose the "Conflict of Interest" before the Trial!
Even though Madalyn did not look at a book or record, she decided to keep the $200,000 given to her to try the $10 million case... a case Madalyn deliberately did not try. Then Madalyn made a phony bill, as all of her bills were phony. She was hired to try the Assets and Liabilities in the case. Didn't try the case at all. Get this... She arranged a trial with her pal, Judge Murakami, to ask for more fees!!! She wanted to and got a lien from Judge Murakami for $126,000 more in fees! Her total fees she got to throw a $10 million case was $325,000. The $30,000 trial of 2006 had all the work done for her. What did she get me? A few hundred thousand dollars, after my foreclosures of all my assets were stopped. That few hundred thousand is to pay off the loan shark loans I had to get during the last five years, waiting for the Court of Appeals, with no support, and no property. If she takes the lien of fees, she manipulated with her judge friend, I am in debt! It is all fraud. This woman belongs in prison.
Madalyn deliberately asked for no back support even though I was owed $1.8 million in back support. Not only did my ex-husband keep all the assets in 2006, while I was left homeless, he continued to make millions in the last five years. Madalyn hid my "Standard of Living" and "Back Support" because she wanted the money from my estate for herself in fees! As well as Steven Hisaka's and Judge Murakami's fees and sanctions that went to Attorney Chuck Kleintop, the golfing buddy. It is all collusive fraud based on fraudulent fees. Hisaka took $280,000 in fees! It is all fraud.
In this Fee Trial, Madalyn sues me for another $126,000 in fees. They have a "Kangaroo" Trial for fees. After the "Kangaroo" divorce trial, they decided to break the 5th Amendment. The 5th Amendment says every citizen has a right to representation. Her and my ex-husband's attorney, Steven Hisaka, decided to freeze the only money I had in the world so I would have no money for representation. My ex-husband stopped all support and I am hocking my jewelry for food. Madalyn Purcell froze the rest.
In this new Fee Trial, she sued me for more fraudulent fees. They have another phony trial where I have no representation. Now they have broken the 5th Amendment and the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America... My right to representation. So, Murakami signs a lien document of $126,000 more in fees to his pal, Purcell, stating Purcell is representing me!
The question is... How can she represent me and sue me at the same time? I had already substituted her out of the case through the Court months earlier. Judge Murakami was well aware of this. The "Racketeering of Fees' continues in the State Court. Purcell writes a lien document. Judge Murakami signs it. She says she is representing me. Just more fraud. These people have no regard of law. They are just interested in how much money they can steal from the Estate to line their pockets.
It is all fraud. Madalyn Purcell breached her contract with me when she showed up at trial with no Property Chart, no Trial Brief, no Exhibit List, leaving out illegal transfers of cash, failed get the witnesses in for trial, and when she failed to prove my "Standard of Living." She breached her fiduciary responsibility to me.
My ex-husband made $1.2 million in illegal transfers to his attorney friends to launder the marital income to them. He made two transfers of $487,000. Madalyn doesn't have these attorneys at trial at all. One of them has already admitted in the 2006 trial that he did no work and has no file.
My ex-husband also made an illegal transfer of $666,000 to his attorney friend. Madalyn did get this witness in. He had nothing to worry about, as Judge Murakami discloses that he was in the attorney's class, who doubles as a teacher. He says he does not feel this is a "Conflict of Interest". Madalyn just lets the trial go forward. The $666,000 transfer is safe as Judge Murakami knows the attorney. Judge Murakami rules in favor of his teacher, even though it was proven the firm did not do the work to merit the $666,000 check.
So now, in 2012, the fraud in the State Court continues. Attorney Steven Hisaka has charged $280,000 for a so-called five day "Trial", which my ex-husband didn't even show up, where no books or records were looked at, no Property Chart or Exhibit List done, no Trial Brief. Do you think under the table money goes to the judges? Da!!!
Fast forward to 2012... Attorney Steven Hisaka (my ex-husband's attorney at the trial) sues me. He writes a completely libelous motion, where he lies for 20 pages. More "Racketeering of Fees". This would cost plenty of money to write. He states my ex-husband is broke. He can't afford the support allotted by the Court, in the "Phony Baloney" Judgment that has nothing to do with my one-half. The fraud is never-ending. Just when I was moving forward with my life and career, the "Honolulu Boys Club" is at it again. Since the attorneys looted the Estate of $861,000 in phony fees. They should be made to give the money they stole back to the Estate!!! I can finally have my property. This is where the criminal charges come in.
I have sent a letter to Governor Abercrombie for a change of venue to Los Angeles, where we were married, to put me in touch with the U.S. Attorney. I need the $861,000 they stole from the Estate, in fees, returned to the Estate. I need a mis-trial. We will see if the Governor will help.
Because of this trial, Honolulu has virtually lost millions upon millions of dollars in real property transactions, as people don't want to buy property, or, live in a state where they have "Organized Crime" in the State Court. The true facts are my real property sold in 2006 should be returned to my ownership of the Estate. It was my home. I should be back in my Los Angeles condo they illegally sold in 2006. They stole my home out from under me and illegally sold it. The 14th Amendment breached again... THE STATE CANNOT TAKE YOUR LIFE, YOUR PROPERTY, WITHOUT "DUE PROCESS." This is the cornerstone of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Stay tuned... It is going to heat up when I press criminal charges. I will be holding a Press Conference to cover the continued abuse and fraud on my life.
I urge all of my fans to read the "Outcome of the Trial" (blue text just below this) so you will see what they did to me in 2006. The judges and attorneys belong in prison. This is a typical example of a bunch of hoodlums taking over a State Court to use to make money!!! It is disgusting. I have a Senate Resolution for my work in the War. I went into the War. I saw young men killed so we can protect our freedom. I found jobs for maimed vets with Nancy Reagan. These young men who are still dying for our Constitution, so these crooks can use the Courts for their own personal gain. It is beyond disgusting. The F.B.I. lets it all go on. Let's hope the Governor will do something. Please feel free to write him on my behalf. This case affects all of us. If they can get away with doing this in Honolulu, they can get away with it anywhere. Martin Luther King said it so well, "If just one of our freedoms is taken away in a court of law, it threatens all of us."
THE OUTCOME OF THE SO-CALLED "TRIAL"
The Marital Settlement Agreement. How They Laundered A $10 million Estate To My Ex-Husband In 2006. I Got None.
The Marital Settlement Agreement I was in, in 2006, was worth $2.4 million to me. Per the Agreement, I got the Los Angeles condo, and he got the Honolulu Estate. I got unconditional support for 5 years of $15 thousand a month, my money I came into the marriage with, part of our annuities, paid health insurance for five years, and $50,000 in cash from a case. Judge Radius in 2006, would set the Marital Settlement Agreement aside when I went to court to enforce it?!! There was a trial about it. At this trial, it was found that the Contract was negotiated by Weinberg, and, his attorney, and, signed by him. I tried to enforce the Agreement and Judge Radius took it away from me. Judge Radius had a special relationship with my ex-husband's attorney, attorney Chuck Kleintop, as, all the judges did in my case. This is the attorney I gave the Hile Hitler sign to when I am hand-cuffed in court, on my video: "Welcome To My Press Conference." Judge Radius said that I "Abandoned" the Contract. I never "abandoned" it! I would have had to legally set aside such a huge agreement, if I didn't want it.
In 2004, I met with an attorney; I wanted to know if the Contract was fair. I knew about the $1.2 million of illegal cash transfers to Jan's attorney friends. The attorney I met with strongly recommended a mediation to find out this information. I signed a contract with the Mediator that said anything I had before the mediation would remain mine if no deal was struck. This is also a Hawaii law. So, I felt my contract was safe, as my allotted me. The mediation went on for eight months. I received no support, and I never saw the Mediator, but once, in eight months, and, my ex-husband did not attend. I discovered my attorney had gone into business with my ex-husband on a case. I fired him, and hired another attorney, went in to enforce my Contract and get out of Honolulu.
My ex-husband switched attorneys from the attorney who negotiated the Contract, to Attorney Chuck Kleintop. Chuck Kleintop would come up with the brilliant idea to say I forged my ex-husband's signature on the Contract. There was a huge flaw in his plan. No handwriting expert would lie for Attorney Chuck Kleintop. He hired Jim Josey, a handwriting expert, of the Honolulu Police Department. When we went to hire him, we found out that Jim had turned down Attorney Chuck Kleintop's case. He said it was Jan's signature, and, would not take the case. We had Jim Josey at trial but Judge Radius would not have him in to testify. There were several boxes of the "Negotiated Contract Material" including a letter from Weinberg, on his stationary, saying he will be signing the Contract tomorrow, which he did.
So, Radius could not say the Contract wasn't signed, as we proved it was his signature right down to where he dots his in the same place every time. Jan's so-called "expert" said, "A lot of letters look like Jan's. It is not traced, and it is not Miss Dickson's."
Yet, Radius' special relationship with Kleintop would prevail. The minute she took the Contract from me, they would begin to illegally liquidate my real property with no "Due Process". If you watch "Welcome To My Press Conference" or the "Police Tape" on my site, you will see me being hauled out of my home by Attorney Kleintop and Judge Radius, who began to sell my estate (in my name), without looking at a book or record, leaving all my art, china, furniture and bank accounts with Weinberg. Just like Nazi Germany. I had built way over $1 million equity in this home, by working on it for 7 1/2 years. It was a historic home. I refurbished it with little help. It was on Queen Emma's land with a stream in the backyard. It was an irreplaceable property that needed to be properly marketed. Along with my Hollywood career, I also have refurbished many estates. I have much knowledge on how to market the properties I refurbish.
I was charged $40,000 for the ridiculous trial drummed up by Attorney Kleintop.Once the contract was taken from me, hundreds of thousands of dollars would flow in attorneys fees. All I was given for attorney fees was $40,000. My attorney would attach my home. As well as other attorneys for cash from the sale of Hawaii estate, and the Los Angeles condo, as Jan would take cart blanch fees out of the pocketed $6.5 million marital income I got no part of.
It gets worse! Judge Radius appointed a realtor to illegally sell my home with no "Due Process", without a book or record looked at. This is completely unconstitutional! I could have easily marketed the home (if it needed to be sold, but with our income neither of our properties needed to be sold. That income would be completely hidden until the 2011 trial!, yet they took complete control over the estate I spent years of my life refurbishing. Judge Radius would order my Honolulu home sold! She, of course, chose a realtor Chuck Kleintop recommended, against our recommendation. Judge Radius appointed a realtor, who was an attorney, who admitted at trial that she was a friend of Attorney Chuck Kleintop. My appraisals of this $2.4 million estate would be ignored at trial, and she (the realtor), with no appraisal (against the law), would sell my home in a fire sale about $1 million under market price at $1.5 million, not to the highest bidder. She would testify that was all it was worth. This is hardly the law. She had no appraisal. She would not sell it to the highest bidder, but a lower bidder. This is also against the law. The 2006 trial a shame,Judge Choy would pop up out of no where and push a trial date forward where I had no representation, no money to mount the trial, no exhibits or witness allowed in for me…I was completely out of it on a prescription drug called atvian.( a extremely strong relaxant) I had a breakdown when I was publicly hull out of my Hawaii home by police. They had put all my things in storage as I stayed in a hundred dollar a night hotel room. Four doctors wrote Judge Choy I was in no condition for trial. He ignored them all. The 6.5 million of income tax returns where not at this trial. I don’t even remember what I said at the trial, I was so out of it. This trial was set aside by the Supreme Court and intermediate court of appeals in 2010.
In 2006, $10 million of assets would be laundered through the State Court, the so-called "trial". I would be left homeless with no support. To date, I have been charged $785,000 in attorney fees. This, I call, "Racketeering for Fees". My attorney fees would come out of real property money, liquidation of my IRA and jewelry, while Jan took our firm money to defend him.
At the 2006 trial, my ex-husband pocketed more than $6.5 million in cash from the firm, laundered real property, our annuities, IRAs and bank accounts, through the State Court. The income tax returns from 2004-2006 would not be at this trial, as well as books, records. The current judge has all the income tax returns. I got none of the $10 million and was left homeless, by Judge Choy. I got no support, except six $6,000 checks. Judge Choy left me in $80,000 credit card debt. I would survive over the past six years by selling my diamonds, liquidating my IRA, which I would be taxed early liqudation.Madelyn would also forget to bring up that at trial or prove this loss had to take out lone shark lone from 11 to 28 percent interest. I am still in eighty thousand credit card debt, even though Judge Choy’s judgment was set aside! Madelyn forgot to bring up the $80,000 credit card debt at trial. So the judgment is set aside, but I still have the old judgment debt!
Our Multi-Million Dollar Business
I was instrumental in changing my ex-husband's in-debt business into a multi-million dollar money making business. His business was failing when I married him. The money to Weinberg from the business was approximately $6.5 million, or, $4 million cash after taxes, of which $2,000,000 was owed to me, either in support, or, cash. The current Judge has the 2004 through 2006 income tax returns. Our cases, at the firm, were worth millions of dollars the minute we signed on the dotted lines. We never lost a case, and, we chose the most severely injured people. We checked with doctors and witnesses before we signed. We needed to know if it was worth the investment of our money. We had a clear idea about the outcome before we signed them.
I was owed back support of no less than $25,000 per month from 2004 to 2011. I got none of the $6.5 million (but the allotted Judgment of $300,000 for the business)? Years of no support. After I pay my outstanding debt, I will virtually have little cash or maybe no cash at all (this is just the damage I suffered). Madelyn failed to ask for back support!
Unbelievably, Madelyn Purcell is asking for another $125,000 in fees! If she is given another $125,000 in fees, I will have no money in my account. She is asking for an additional $125,000 in fees after already getting $200,000 from the Court by lying about what she was using it for, and, who she was going to pay for that kind of money. No one authorized her to spend this extra $125,000, and I assure you she did not do the work of even $50,000, as she failed to bring the evidence to Court to prove the case. This was her job and what she was paid for.
Madelyn Purcell did not prove $10 million! She proved very little. The thing she was hired to do, she deliberately did not so. Even though the entire case was worked up for her by the prior attorney. In 2006, Mary Lucas, did all the exhibits they were perfectly organized, Madelyn didn't use Mary Lucas’s Exhibits, in an organized fashion, as they where prepared. Al
Unbelievably, after not having to work on the case at all, other than hire experts, and, hire a few witnesses, Madelyn was given $200,000 cash for the case.
Madelyn failed to try the nuts and bolts of the case. She is now coming back, after she was told at the "Reconsideration Hearing" no more fees from Weinberg. She now wants another $125,000 in fees from me!
The Illegal Jail Time
The protection of the prior judges and Attorney Kleintop's moves are vivid in this trial. As you may recall, in 2006, Judge Choy ordered a trial date to go forward, while I had no representation, no money to mount the trial, no exhibits or witnesses allowed in for me, no recent tax returns, no books or records looked at. I also had a breakdown from being publicly hauled out of my home in 2005. I was heavily medicated with a medication called Ativan.
For instance, Judge Choy's divorce decree was fraud. It stated that my ex-husband could name any price he wanted on the Los Angeles condo and Honolulu estate, sell it to whomever he wanted, and, could ask any price he wanted. Both states require a court-appointed realtor, a bona fide appraisal, and the property should be sold on the open market to the highest bidder, and the sale overseen by a judge. What was done was against the law in California and Honolulu. The so-called "fines" and jail time is completely illegal. Judge Choy exceeded his jurisdiction when he tried to sell a property in California (and did). The law is (fraudulent judgment, now set aside, which left me homeless with no property and no support!). His divorce decree, by California law needed to be "Domesticated" into the Family Law Court of California. There, a judge, by law, would court-appoint a realtor, get a bona fide appraisal, and sell the California condo , on the open market to the highest bidder. My ex-husband had a trial in California to evict me. Judge Baker of California (now on the Supreme Court) ordered he couldn't evict, and, that the judgment of Choy's needed to be "Domesticated" into the California Courts, or it didn't exist in California. Judge Baker told him that he couldn't evict me. It was after her orders Jan broke and entered into my condo, while Judge Choy had me illegally locked up in a Honolulu jail (for following California law.) Judge Choy crossed state lines as he illegally jailed me, and sold the condo. They sold the Los Angeles condo to a real estate investor, who flipped the property (after I got out of jail and threatened to sue her) for a quick $140,000 profit. This was a quick sale. It was worth even more. The appraisal was for an additional $280,000. The property in Los Angeles was sold for $420,000 under market value, not to the highest bidder, and not on the open market. The Honolulu property sold for about $900,000 or more under market value. There was no reason to sell the California condo (my home) as the income was more than enough to pay both properties. They arranged for my ex to keep all the income, and take the cash from both properties.
What Is Happening now:I must go back into court to get my back support of 1.5 million, and my real property cash of $261,000, possible malpractice suit.
STAY TUNED... THIS IS NOT OVER. CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO HOME PAGE.